lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:25:47 +0300
From:   Hanna Hawa <hannah@...vell.com>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        <will.deacon@....com>, <corbet@....net>, <joro@...tes.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <jason@...edaemon.net>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
        <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, <nadavh@...vell.com>,
        <omrii@...vell.com>, <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu: Workaround for Marvell Armada-AP806
 SoC erratum #582743

Hi Robin,


On 10/15/2018 04:00 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Hanna,
>
> On 15/10/18 13:00, hannah@...vell.com wrote:
>> From: Hanna Hawa <hannah@...vell.com>
>>
>> Due to erratum #582743, the Marvell Armada-AP806 can't access 64bit
>> to ARM SMMUv2 registers.
>> This patch split the writeq/readq to two accesses of writel/readl.
>>
>> Note that separate writes/reads to 2 is not problem regards to atomicity,
>> because the driver use the readq/writeq while initialize the SMMU, report
>> for SMMU fault, and use spinlock in one case (iova_to_phys).
>
> In general, this doesn't work. Here's what the SMMU spec says about
> SMMU_CBn_TLBIVA, but others are similar:
>
> "If SMMU_CBA2Rn.VA64 is one, then AArch64 format is selected. The
> programmer should use 64 bit accesses to this register. If 32-bit
> accesses are used then writes to the top 32 bits are ignored and writes
> to the lower 32 bits are zero extended."
>
> If your interconnect won't let 64-bit transactions through, then you
> can't use AArch64 format at stage 1 at all, since there's no way to
> invalidate entries with the correct ASID, and you'll have to restrict
> stage 2 formats to at most 44-bit IOVAs in order for TLBIIPAS2{L} not to
> invalidate the wrong thing.
Thanks for your suggestion.

To restrict the IOVAs i need to add another work-around to the driver to 
limit the va_size, is that acceptable?

What the different in the driver between AARCH32_L & AARCH32_S?

>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hannah@...vell.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt |  2 ++
>>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c               | 33
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>   2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
>> b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
>> index 3b2f2dd..fc3f2a0 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
>> @@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ stable kernels.
>>   | Cavium         | ThunderX2 SMMUv3| #74             |
>> N/A                         |
>>   | Cavium         | ThunderX2 SMMUv3| #126            |
>> N/A                         |
>>   |                |                 |
>> |                             |
>> +| Marvell        | ARM-MMU-500     | #582743         |
>> N/A                         |
>> +|                |                 |
>> |                             |
>
> Nit: the convention here seems to be at least alphabetically sorted by
> Implementer.
>
>>   | Freescale/NXP  | LS2080A/LS1043A | A-008585        |
>> FSL_ERRATUM_A008585         |
>>   |                |                 |
>> |                             |
>>   | Hisilicon      | Hip0{5,6,7}     | #161010101      |
>> HISILICON_ERRATUM_161010101 |
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> index fccb1d4..d64f892 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ enum arm_smmu_arch_version {
>>   enum arm_smmu_implementation {
>>       GENERIC_SMMU,
>>       ARM_MMU500,
>> +    MRVL_MMU500,
>
> Is there any actually modification to the MMU-500 RTL itself here, or is
> the problem just in the interconnect in front of the SMMU programming
> interface? I would normally assume the latter, in which case treating it
> as a separate implementation isn't really accurate, and I'd much rather
> handle any workaround via smmu->options, just like the secure access
> workaround (which is a similar integration issue).
No actual modification to the RTL, i'll use the smmu->option
Thanks for your review & suggestions.

Hanna
>
> Robin.
>
>>       CAVIUM_SMMUV2,
>>   };
>>   @@ -276,13 +277,35 @@ static inline void smmu_writeq_relaxed(struct
>> arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>>                          u64 val,
>>                          void __iomem *addr)
>>   {
>> -    writeq_relaxed(val, addr);
>> +    /*
>> +     * Marvell Armada-AP806 erratum #582743.
>> +     * Split all the writeq to double writel
>> +     */
>> +    if (smmu->model != MRVL_MMU500) {
>> +        writeq_relaxed(val, addr);
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(val), addr + 4);
>> +    writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(val), addr);
>>   }
>>     static inline u64 smmu_readq_relaxed(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>>                        void __iomem *addr)
>>   {
>> -    return readq_relaxed(addr);
>> +    u64 val;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Marvell Armada-AP806 erratum #582743.
>> +     * Split all the readq to double readl
>> +     */
>> +    if (smmu->model != MRVL_MMU500)
>> +        return readq_relaxed(addr);
>> +
>> +    val = (u64)readl_relaxed(addr + 4) << 32;
>> +    val |= readl_relaxed(addr);
>> +
>> +    return val;
>>   }
>>     static void parse_driver_options(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>> @@ -1611,7 +1634,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_device_reset(struct
>> arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>       for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_mapping_groups; ++i)
>>           arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, i);
>>   -    if (smmu->model == ARM_MMU500) {
>> +    if (smmu->model == ARM_MMU500 || smmu->model == MRVL_MMU500) {
>>           /*
>>            * Before clearing ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE, need to
>>            * clear CACHE_LOCK bit of ACR first. And, CACHE_LOCK
>> @@ -1640,7 +1663,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_device_reset(struct
>> arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>            * Disable MMU-500's not-particularly-beneficial next-page
>>            * prefetcher for the sake of errata #841119 and #826419.
>>            */
>> -        if (smmu->model == ARM_MMU500) {
>> +        if (smmu->model == ARM_MMU500 || smmu->model == MRVL_MMU500) {
>>               reg = readl_relaxed(cb_base + ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
>>               reg &= ~ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE;
>>               writel_relaxed(reg, cb_base + ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
>> @@ -1923,6 +1946,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_match_data {
>>   ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v2, ARM_SMMU_V2, GENERIC_SMMU);
>>   ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(arm_mmu401, ARM_SMMU_V1_64K, GENERIC_SMMU);
>>   ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(arm_mmu500, ARM_SMMU_V2, ARM_MMU500);
>> +ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(mrvl_mmu500, ARM_SMMU_V2, MRVL_MMU500);
>>   ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(cavium_smmuv2, ARM_SMMU_V2, CAVIUM_SMMUV2);
>>     static const struct of_device_id arm_smmu_of_match[] = {
>> @@ -1931,6 +1955,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_match_data {
>>       { .compatible = "arm,mmu-400", .data = &smmu_generic_v1 },
>>       { .compatible = "arm,mmu-401", .data = &arm_mmu401 },
>>       { .compatible = "arm,mmu-500", .data = &arm_mmu500 },
>> +    { .compatible = "marvell,mmu-500", .data = &mrvl_mmu500 },
>>       { .compatible = "cavium,smmu-v2", .data = &cavium_smmuv2 },
>>       { },
>>   };
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ