linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] xhci: remove the unused sw_lpm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1545bbcc-ca1a-b1fe-7363-ad05cbc7245c@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:33:34 +0300
From:   Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: remove the unused sw_lpm_support

On 16.10.2018 14:37, Zeng Tao wrote:
> It is introduced for the pre-0.96 xHC controllers, and the driver only
> support HW LPM for 1.0 and later controllers.It's not actually used now
> and is thought not to be used in the future any more, so just remove it.
> 
> Acked-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>

Please don't add my Acked-by to patches I haven't seen.

 From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
  
"Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:.  It is a record that the acker
has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance."

> Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>

Otherwise the patch looks good, I'll queue it, and remove the extra Acked-by

Thanks
-Mathias