lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:44:04 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Gabriel Capella <gabriel@...ella.pro>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-usp@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: adc: Add comments to prevent checks
 corrections

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 06:25:21PM -0300, Gabriel Capella wrote:
> This patch adds 3 comments in 2 different files.
> These comments warn to don't correct the checks of type:
> "CHECK: spaces preferred around that '-'"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Capella <gabriel@...ella.pro>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c  | 1 +
>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> index acdbc07fd259..786ace19c240 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> @@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ ad7192_show_scale_available(struct device *dev,
>  	return len;
>  }
>  
> +/* Do not put spaces around the hyphen. #checkpatch.pl */
>  static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_NAMED(in_v_m_v_scale_available,
>  			     in_voltage-voltage_scale_available,
>  			     0444, ad7192_show_scale_available, NULL, 0);

No one will read that...  :(  It has to be on the same line.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ