[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153980741313.5275.10376918222904341760@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:16:53 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Craig <ctatlor97@...il.com>,
Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>, andy.gross@...aro.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux@...linux.org.uk, mark.rutland@....com,
mturquette@...libre.com, niklas.cassel@...aro.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, robh@...nel.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, thierry.escande@...aro.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 00/14] Krait clocks + Krait CPUfreq
Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-10-17 08:44:12)
> Quoting Sricharan R (2018-09-20 06:03:31)
> >
> >
> > On 9/20/2018 1:54 AM, Craig wrote:
> > > Yup, this patch seems to have fixed the higher frequencies from the quick test I did.
> > >
> > Thanks !!. Can i take that as
> > Tested-by: Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@...il.com> ?
> >
>
> Is this patch series going to be resent?
>
Nevermind. Looking at it I think I can apply all the clk ones and we're
good to go. If you can send a followup patch series to change the
registration and provider APIs to be clk_hw instead of clk based I would
appreciate it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists