linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V12 00/14] Krait clocks + Krait CPUfreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5f492c0-19a2-db8f-a114-d3cfe17ae6c6@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:39:03 +0530
From:   Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Craig <ctatlor97@...il.com>,
        andy.gross@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, mark.rutland@....com,
        mturquette@...libre.com, niklas.cassel@...aro.org,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, robh@...nel.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
        sudeep.holla@....com, thierry.escande@...aro.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 00/14] Krait clocks + Krait CPUfreq

Hi Stephen,

On 10/18/2018 1:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-10-17 08:44:12)
>> Quoting Sricharan R (2018-09-20 06:03:31)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/20/2018 1:54 AM, Craig wrote:
>>>> Yup, this patch seems to have fixed the higher frequencies from the quick test I did.
>>>>
>>>       Thanks !!. Can i take that as 
>>>           Tested-by: Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@...il.com>  ?
>>>
>>
>> Is this patch series going to be resent?
>>
> 
> Nevermind. Looking at it I think I can apply all the clk ones and we're
> good to go. If you can send a followup patch series to change the
> registration and provider APIs to be clk_hw instead of clk based I would
> appreciate it.
> 

Sorry for the late response. Was away.
Only pending thing was separating out the binding documentation for the cpu-freq
driver and fixing the text in documentation.  That means, yes its fine to merge
the clk ones as you said. I will resend that. Also, will send a follow up series for clk_hw to
clk change as you mentioned separately.

Regards,
 Sricharan

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation