linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V12 00/14] Krait clocks + Krait CPUfreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181022153005.GA23950@centauri.lan>
Date:   Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:30:05 +0200
From:   Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>
To:     Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Craig <ctatlor97@...il.com>,
        andy.gross@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, mark.rutland@....com,
        mturquette@...libre.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, robh@...nel.org,
        sboyd@...eaurora.org, sudeep.holla@....com,
        thierry.escande@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 00/14] Krait clocks + Krait CPUfreq

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:39:03AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> On 10/18/2018 1:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-10-17 08:44:12)
> >> Quoting Sricharan R (2018-09-20 06:03:31)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 9/20/2018 1:54 AM, Craig wrote:
> >>>> Yup, this patch seems to have fixed the higher frequencies from the quick test I did.
> >>>>
> >>>       Thanks !!. Can i take that as 
> >>>           Tested-by: Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@...il.com>  ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Is this patch series going to be resent?
> >>
> > 
> > Nevermind. Looking at it I think I can apply all the clk ones and we're
> > good to go. If you can send a followup patch series to change the
> > registration and provider APIs to be clk_hw instead of clk based I would
> > appreciate it.
> > 
> 
> Sorry for the late response. Was away.
> Only pending thing was separating out the binding documentation for the cpu-freq
> driver and fixing the text in documentation.  That means, yes its fine to merge
> the clk ones as you said. I will resend that. Also, will send a follow up series for clk_hw to
> clk change as you mentioned separately.

Hello Sricharan,

Great to see that the clk parts has been marged to clk-next!

Are you also planning on sending out a new version of the cpufreq driver
consolidation parts?

I'm planning on extending your consilidated cpufreq driver with support
for msm8916 (Cortex-A53), where I plan to read PVS/speedbin, in order to
set opp_supported_hw(), and also register with cpufreq (since Viresh/Ulf
suggested that we shouldn't register with cpufreq in the CPR power-domain
driver).


Kind regards,
Niklas