[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14408.1539790333@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:32:13 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, gregkh@...ux-foundation.org,
Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.modukuri@...il.com>,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, sandeen@...hat.com,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] fscache: Fix race in fscache_op_complete() due to split atomic_sub & read
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com> wrote:
> > Fix this by using atomic_sub_return() instead of two calls.
>
> Seems a case for atomic_sub_return_relaxed()... why not?
Ummm... In that case, should it be atomic_sub_return_release()?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists