[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05c4811b-1d2b-c46f-bcde-2fbd650a301c@embeddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:45:13 +0200
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Update SERDES_MAX to be SERDES_MAX
+ 1
On 10/17/18 5:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> Friendly ping. Who can you take this?
>>
>> Applied. No need (nor benefit) to ping me. You can check the status of
>> DT patches on patchwork[1]. If it is there and in the "New" state, it is
>> in my queue.
>
> Actually, this doesn't apply to my tree as the file doesn't exist. It
> needs to go thru the phy tree. You didn't Cc the maintainer nor list, so
> resend.
>
This is what I get when I run the get_maintainer script:
linux$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nokeywords --nogit --nogit-fallback include/dt-bindings/phy/phy-ocelot-serdes.h
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
devicetree@...r.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
But I'll send it to the phy guys as you suggest.
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists