[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1810181459120.1647@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:03:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 05/13] x86/smt: Create cpu_smt_enabled static key for
SMT specific code
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, Tim Chen wrote:
> Create the cpu_smt_enabled static key to indicate if we are
> using SMT. SMT specific code paths are executed only when SMT
> code paths are enabled by this key.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/cpu.h | 1 +
> kernel/cpu.c | 12 ++++++++++--
I have a hard time to understand why the subject prefix is x86/smt.
This want's to be split into:
1) Add the static key to the core
2) Make use of it in x86
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists