lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 08:06:26 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: uniphier: move cache-uniphier.txt to
 vendor directory

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:12 PM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:01 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:25:24 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > Now, the Socionext vendor directory is available at
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/socionext/
> > >
> > > Move cache-uniphier.txt over to it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > >   - New patch
> > >
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/{uniphier => socionext}/cache-uniphier.txt    | 0
> > >  1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >  rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/{uniphier => socionext}/cache-uniphier.txt (100%)
> > >
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
>
> Thanks for your review!
>
> You gave your Reviewed-by twice to 2/2,
> but nothing to 1/2.
>
> Is the first patch under review?
> Or, did you accidentally do that
> instead of replying to each of the two?

Humm, some sort of scripting fail. Yes, you can add my R-by to 1/2 also.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ