linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: uniphier: move cache-uniphier.txt to vendor directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQ+j4pRxCorfyf23L8ZRXV_mF-uQd3ab7rwP9vKktsE+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:11:21 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: uniphier: move cache-uniphier.txt to
 vendor directory

Hi Rob,


On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:01 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:25:24 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Now, the Socionext vendor directory is available at
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/socionext/
> >
> > Move cache-uniphier.txt over to it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> >   - New patch
> >
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/{uniphier => socionext}/cache-uniphier.txt    | 0
> >  1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >  rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/{uniphier => socionext}/cache-uniphier.txt (100%)
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>


Thanks for your review!

You gave your Reviewed-by twice to 2/2,
but nothing to 1/2.

Is the first patch under review?
Or, did you accidentally do that
instead of replying to each of the two?


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada