linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] iw_cxgb4: fix a missing-check bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 20 Oct 2018 19:15:17 -0500
From:   "Steve Wise" <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To:     "'Wenwen Wang'" <wang6495@....edu>
Cc:     "'Kangjie Lu'" <kjlu@....edu>, <swise@...lsio.com>,
        <dledford@...hat.com>, <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "'open list'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] iw_cxgb4: fix a missing-check bug



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@....edu>
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2018 6:56 PM
> To: swise@...ngridcomputing.com
> Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>; swise@...lsio.com; dledford@...hat.com;
> jgg@...pe.ca; linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org; open list <linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Wenwen Wang <wang6495@....edu>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] iw_cxgb4: fix a missing-check bug
> 
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 6:41 PM Steve Wise
> <swise@...ngridcomputing.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Wenwen,
> >
> > > Subject: [PATCH] iw_cxgb4: fix a missing-check bug
> > >
> > > In c4iw_flush_hw_cq, the next CQE is acquired through
> t4_next_hw_cqe(). In
> > > t4_next_hw_cqe(), the CQE, i.e., 'cq->queue[cq->cidx]', is checked to see
> > > whether it is valid through t4_valid_cqe(). If it is valid, the address of
> > > the CQE is then saved to 'hw_cqe'. Later on, the CQE is copied to the
> > local
> > > memory in create_read_req_cqe(). The problem here is that the CQE is
> > > actually in a DMA region allocated by dma_alloc_coherent() in
> create_cq().
> > > Given that the device also has the permission to access the DMA region, a
> > > malicious device controlled by an attacker can modify the CQE in the DMA
> > > region after the check in t4_next_hw_cqe() but before the copy in
> > > create_read_req_cqe(). By doing so, the attacker can supply invalid CQE,
> > > which can cause undefined behavior of the kernel and introduce
> potential
> > > security risks.
> > >
> >
> > If the dma device is malicious, couldn't it just dma some incorrect CQE but
> > still valid in the first place?  I don't think this patch actually solves
> > the issue, and it forces a copy of a 64B CQE in a critical data io path.
> 
> Thanks for your response! If the malicious dma device just dma some
> incorrect CQE, it will not be able to pass the verification in
> t4_valid_cqe().
> 

As long as the gen bit is correct, the CQE is considered valid.  You cannot protect against a malicious dma device.  Or at least not with the current driver/device contract.

Steve.