linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] M

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8d7fcd11-b537-97c1-ee50-ba30f236b5ec@grandegger.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:43:19 +0200
From:   Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, mkl@...gutronix.de,
        davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] M_CAN Framework rework

Hallo Dan,

I will have a closer look later this week. Unfortunately you already
renamed file names and structs making the patch almost unreadable. More
soon..

Thanks for you patience,

Wolfgang.

Am 17.10.2018 um 22:21 schrieb Dan Murphy:
> Bump
> 
> On 10/10/2018 09:20 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> All
>>
>> This patch series creates a m_can core framework that devices can register
>> to.  The m_can core manages the Bosch IP and CAN frames.  Each device that
>> is registered is responsible for managing device specific functions.
>>
>> This rewrite was suggested in a device driver submission for the TCAN4x5x
>> device
>> Reference upstream post:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/984163/
>>
>> For instance the TCAN device is a SPI device that uses a specific data payload to
>> determine writes and reads.  In addition the device has a reset input as well
>> as a wakeup pin.  The register offset of the m_can registers differs and must
>> be set by the device attached to the core.
>>
>> The m_can core will use iomapped writes and reads as the default mechanism for
>> writing and reading.  The device driver can provide over rides for this.
>>
>> This patch series is not complete as it does not handle the CAN interrupts
>> nor can perform a CAN write.  If this patch series is deemed acceptable I will
>> finish debugging the driver and post a non RFC series.
>>
>> Finally I did attempt to reduce the first patch with various git format patch
>> directives but none seemed to reduce the patch.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> Dan Murphy (3):
>>   can: m_can: Create m_can core to leverage common code
>>   dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Add DT bindings for TCAN4x5X driver
>>   can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4x5x driver to the kernel
>>
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt  |   34 +
>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/Kconfig                 |   18 +
>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/Makefile                |    4 +-
>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c                 | 1683 +----------------
>>  .../net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c}   |  479 +++--
>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h            |  100 +
>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c              |  321 ++++
>>  7 files changed, 722 insertions(+), 1917 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt
>>  copy drivers/net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} (83%)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c
>>
> 
>