[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1db25e4b-9b83-a234-b98f-e3c0c72d5e31@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:36:10 -0500
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
<davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] M_CAN Framework rework
Wolfgang
On 10/24/2018 02:43 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hallo Dan,
>
> I will have a closer look later this week. Unfortunately you already
> renamed file names and structs making the patch almost unreadable. More
> soon..
>
I tried to format the patch to eliminate the massive change but format patch kept
giving me the same result.
It is a massive change regardless not sure how else to make is smaller.
I guess this is why I opt'd to just create the dedicated TCAN driver.
Dan
> Thanks for you patience,
>
> Wolfgang.
>
> Am 17.10.2018 um 22:21 schrieb Dan Murphy:
>> Bump
>>
>> On 10/10/2018 09:20 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> All
>>>
>>> This patch series creates a m_can core framework that devices can register
>>> to. The m_can core manages the Bosch IP and CAN frames. Each device that
>>> is registered is responsible for managing device specific functions.
>>>
>>> This rewrite was suggested in a device driver submission for the TCAN4x5x
>>> device
>>> Reference upstream post:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/984163/
>>>
>>> For instance the TCAN device is a SPI device that uses a specific data payload to
>>> determine writes and reads. In addition the device has a reset input as well
>>> as a wakeup pin. The register offset of the m_can registers differs and must
>>> be set by the device attached to the core.
>>>
>>> The m_can core will use iomapped writes and reads as the default mechanism for
>>> writing and reading. The device driver can provide over rides for this.
>>>
>>> This patch series is not complete as it does not handle the CAN interrupts
>>> nor can perform a CAN write. If this patch series is deemed acceptable I will
>>> finish debugging the driver and post a non RFC series.
>>>
>>> Finally I did attempt to reduce the first patch with various git format patch
>>> directives but none seemed to reduce the patch.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> Dan Murphy (3):
>>> can: m_can: Create m_can core to leverage common code
>>> dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Add DT bindings for TCAN4x5X driver
>>> can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4x5x driver to the kernel
>>>
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt | 34 +
>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/Kconfig | 18 +
>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/Makefile | 4 +-
>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 1683 +----------------
>>> .../net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} | 479 +++--
>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h | 100 +
>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c | 321 ++++
>>> 7 files changed, 722 insertions(+), 1917 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt
>>> copy drivers/net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} (83%)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c
>>>
>>
>>
--
------------------
Dan Murphy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists