[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9D9FC1E7@hasmsx109.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:01:25 +0000
From: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
"Struk, Tadeusz" <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] tpm: tpm_try_transmit() refactor error flow.
>
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > To the out label we jump after we are done with locality and cmd
> > read() before we jump to locality 'locality'. We will need to add
> > another variable to check If cmd_ready() was called or not in order to
> > get rid of the extran label, it's not internally tracked so far.
>
> I think this is fine.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> I tested this by assigning rc error code instead of requesting locality in
> addition of testig unchanged code.
>
Great
Thanks
Tomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists