[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJ__4gXH-6ns5fiun6G29ppYWLRE_G=4s0vTus+ccGXcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:59:39 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: wanghaifine@...il.com
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change judgment len position
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:47 AM Wang Hai <wanghaifine@...il.com> wrote:
>
> To determine whether len is less than zero, it should be put before
> the function min_t, because the return value of min_t is not likely
> to be less than zero.
????
I really wonder if you actually tested this patch.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists