linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] arm64: dts: sdm845: enable tsens thermal zones

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Oct 2018 01:33:40 +0530
From:   Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To:     mka@...omium.org
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        smohanad@...eaurora.org, Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] arm64: dts: sdm845: enable tsens thermal zones

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:55 AM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> vaguely related question, since you are working on SDM845 thermal
> stuff: Do you have plans to add CPU cooling devices? I raised the
> point during the review of the CPUfreq HW, however there was no
> clear answer: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/966833/#1164748
> The driver is still under development/review, but I wonder what the
> path forward is.
>

Hi Matthias,

I plan to but the OSM driver doesn't work well enough for me to send
out that patch yet. I responded with my findings on the v9 posting
where it seems to get stuck at the high OPP. It'd be nice if somebody
else could confirm (or refute) this behaviour.

Regards,
Amit