linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] arm64: dts: sdm845: enable tsens thermal zones

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:37:52 -0700
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        smohanad@...eaurora.org, Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] arm64: dts: sdm845: enable tsens thermal zones

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 01:33:40AM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:55 AM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Amit,
> >
> > vaguely related question, since you are working on SDM845 thermal
> > stuff: Do you have plans to add CPU cooling devices? I raised the
> > point during the review of the CPUfreq HW, however there was no
> > clear answer: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/966833/#1164748
> > The driver is still under development/review, but I wonder what the
> > path forward is.
> >
> 
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> I plan to

Great!

> but the OSM driver doesn't work well enough for me to send
> out that patch yet. I responded with my findings on the v9 posting
> where it seems to get stuck at the high OPP. It'd be nice if somebody
> else could confirm (or refute) this behaviour.

Ok, we aren't using the latest version yet, I'll try to repro and
report back.

Cheers

Matthias