| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 17:06:48 -0500
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>,
Wendy Liang <sunnyliangjy@...il.com>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
"benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org" <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with specific
dma memory pool
On 10/24/18 7:42 AM, Loic PALLARDY wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
>> Sent: mercredi 24 octobre 2018 03:49
>> To: Wendy Liang <sunnyliangjy@...il.com>; Loic PALLARDY
>> <loic.pallardy@...com>
>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>; Ohad Ben-Cohen
>> <ohad@...ery.com>; linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org; Linux Kernel
>> Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Arnaud POULIQUEN
>> <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>; benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with
>> specific dma memory pool
>>
>> On 10/23/18 8:22 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>>> On 9/27/18 3:18 PM, Wendy Liang wrote:
>>>> Hi Loic,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:22 PM Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Wendy
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Wendy Liang <sunnyliangjy@...il.com>
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 7:17 PM
>>>>>> To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>
>>>>>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>; Ohad Ben-Cohen
>>>>>> <ohad@...ery.com>; linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org; Linux Kernel
>>>>>> Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Arnaud POULIQUEN
>>>>>> <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>; benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org; Suman
>> Anna
>>>>>> <s-anna@...com>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with
>>>>>> specific dma memory pool
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 6:16 AM Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch creates a dedicated vdev subdevice for each vdev declared
>>>>>>> in firmware resource table and associates carveout named
>> "vdev%dbuffer"
>>>>>>> (with %d vdev index in resource table) if any as dma coherent
>> memory
>>>>>> pool.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then vdev subdevice is used as parent for virtio device.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 35
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 1 +
>>>>>>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 42
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>>> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 1 +
>>>>>>> 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>>>>>>> index 4edc6f0..adcc66e 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>>>>>>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>>>>>> #include <linux/idr.h>
>>>>>>> #include <linux/elf.h>
>>>>>>> #include <linux/crc32.h>
>>>>>>> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>>>>>>> #include <linux/virtio_ids.h>
>>>>>>> #include <linux/virtio_ring.h>
>>>>>>> #include <asm/byteorder.h>
>>>>>>> @@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ static void rproc_disable_iommu(struct rproc
>>>>>> *rproc)
>>>>>>> iommu_domain_free(domain);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -static phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr)
>>>>>>> +phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>> * Return physical address according to virtual address location
>>>>>>> @@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ static phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void
>>>>>> *cpu_addr)
>>>>>>> WARN_ON(!virt_addr_valid(cpu_addr));
>>>>>>> return virt_to_phys(cpu_addr);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_va_to_pa);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /**
>>>>>>> * rproc_da_to_va() - lookup the kernel virtual address for a
>> remoteproc
>>>>>> address
>>>>>>> @@ -423,6 +425,20 @@ static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct
>>>>>> rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /**
>>>>>>> + * rproc_rvdev_release() - release the existence of a rvdev
>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>> + * @dev: the subdevice's dev
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> +static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(dev, struct rproc_vdev,
>> dev);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + kfree(rvdev);
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>> * rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource
>>>>>>> * @rproc: the remote processor
>>>>>>> * @rsc: the vring resource descriptor
>>>>>>> @@ -455,6 +471,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc
>> *rproc,
>>>>>> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
>>>>>>> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>>>>>>> struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
>>>>>>> int i, ret;
>>>>>>> + char name[16];
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /* make sure resource isn't truncated */
>>>>>>> if (sizeof(*rsc) + rsc->num_of_vrings * sizeof(struct
>>>>>> fw_rsc_vdev_vring)
>>>>>>> @@ -488,6 +505,18 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc
>> *rproc,
>>>>>> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
>>>>>>> rvdev->rproc = rproc;
>>>>>>> rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev++;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + /* Initialise vdev subdevice */
>>>>>>> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index);
>>>>>>> + rvdev->dev.parent = rproc->dev.parent;
>>>>>>> + rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release;
>>>>>>> + dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev-
>>>>>>> dev.parent), name);
>>>>>>> + dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev);
>>>>>>> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&rvdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>>>>>> I tried the latest kernel, this function will not set the DMA coherent
>> mask as
>>>>>> dma_supported() of the &rvdev->dev will return false.
>>>>>> As this is a device created at run time, should it be force to support
>> DMA?
>>>>>> should it directly set the dma_coherent_mask?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for pointing me this issue. I tested on top of 4.18-rc1 few months
>> ago...
>>>>> Could you please give me kernel version on which you are testing the
>> series?
>>>>> Is you platform 32bit or 64bit ?
>>>>> I'll rebase and check on my side.
>>>>
>>>> I am testing with 4.19-rc4 on aarch64 platform.
>>>
>>> Btw, I ran into this on my v7 platform as well (4.19-rc6). The
>>> dma_set_coherent_mask fails with error EIO. I did get my allocations
>>> through though.
>>
>> Correction, that was before Patch 17. With patch 17, this fails.
>
> Yes normal as device for allocation is changed Patch17.
The failure was due to dma_alloc failure in rpmsg_probe, your patch13
should have registered the DMA pool for this, and I think the root-cause
is back to the dma_set_coherent_mask failure and unsupported dma_ops on
this device.
regards
Suman
> Regards,
> Loic
>>
>> regards
>> Suman
>>
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Suman
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Wendy
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Loic
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev);
>>>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>>>> + goto free_rvdev;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> /* parse the vrings */
>>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) {
>>>>>>> ret = rproc_parse_vring(rvdev, rsc, i);
>>>>>>> @@ -518,7 +547,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc
>> *rproc,
>>>>>> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
>>>>>>> for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
>>>>>>> rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]);
>>>>>>> free_rvdev:
>>>>>>> - kfree(rvdev);
>>>>>>> + device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
>>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @@ -536,7 +565,7 @@ void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
>>>>>>> list_del(&rvdev->node);
>>>>>>> - kfree(rvdev);
>>>>>>> + device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /**
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>>>>>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>>>>>>> index f6cad24..bfeacfd 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>>>>>>> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct dentry *rproc_create_trace_file(const
>> char
>>>>>> *name, struct rproc *rproc,
>>>>>>> int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len);
>>>>>>> +phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr);
>>>>>>> int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware
>> *fw);
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>>>>>>> index de21f62..9ee63c0 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>>>>>>> @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
>>>>>>> * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>>>>>>> #include <linux/export.h>
>>>>>>> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>>>>>>> #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>>>>>>> #include <linux/virtio.h>
>>>>>>> #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
>>>>>>> @@ -315,10 +317,48 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct
>> device
>>>>>> *dev)
>>>>>>> int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc;
>>>>>>> - struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>>>>>>> + struct device *dev = &rvdev->dev;
>>>>>>> struct virtio_device *vdev = &rvdev->vdev;
>>>>>>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>>>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + /* Try to find dedicated vdev buffer carveout */
>>>>>>> + mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdev%dbuffer",
>> rvdev-
>>>>>>> index);
>>>>>>> + if (mem) {
>>>>>>> + phys_addr_t pa;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + if (mem->of_resm_idx != -1) {
>>>>>>> + struct device_node *np = rproc->dev.parent->of_node;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + /* Associate reserved memory to vdev device */
>>>>>>> + ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np,
>>>>>>> + mem->of_resm_idx);
>>>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Can't associate reserved memory\n");
>>>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>> + if (mem->va) {
>>>>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "vdev %d buffer already mapped\n",
>>>>>>> + rvdev->index);
>>>>>>> + pa = rproc_va_to_pa(mem->va);
>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>> + /* Use dma address as carveout no memmapped yet
>> */
>>>>>>> + pa = (phys_addr_t)mem->dma;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + /* Associate vdev buffer memory pool to vdev subdev */
>>>>>>> + ret = dmam_declare_coherent_memory(dev, pa,
>>>>>>> + mem->da,
>>>>>>> + mem->len,
>>>>>>> + DMA_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE);
>>>>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to associate buffer\n");
>>>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> vdev->id.device = id,
>>>>>>> vdev->config = &rproc_virtio_config_ops,
>>>>>>> vdev->dev.parent = dev;
>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>>>>>> index 6b3a234..2921dd2 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>>>>>> @@ -547,6 +547,7 @@ struct rproc_vdev {
>>>>>>> struct kref refcount;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> struct rproc_subdev subdev;
>>>>>>> + struct device dev;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> unsigned int id;
>>>>>>> struct list_head node;
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 1.9.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
>> remoteproc"
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-
>> info.html
>>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists