| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:16:40 -0500
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>,
Wendy Liang <sunnyliangjy@...il.com>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
"benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org" <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with specific
dma memory pool
On 10/24/18 7:40 AM, Loic PALLARDY wrote:
> Hi Suman,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
>> Sent: mercredi 24 octobre 2018 03:22
>> To: Wendy Liang <sunnyliangjy@...il.com>; Loic PALLARDY
>> <loic.pallardy@...com>
>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>; Ohad Ben-Cohen
>> <ohad@...ery.com>; linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org; Linux Kernel
>> Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Arnaud POULIQUEN
>> <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>; benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with
>> specific dma memory pool
>>
>> On 9/27/18 3:18 PM, Wendy Liang wrote:
>>> Hi Loic,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:22 PM Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Wendy
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Wendy Liang <sunnyliangjy@...il.com>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 7:17 PM
>>>>> To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>
>>>>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>; Ohad Ben-Cohen
>>>>> <ohad@...ery.com>; linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org; Linux Kernel
>>>>> Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Arnaud POULIQUEN
>>>>> <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>; benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org; Suman
>> Anna
>>>>> <s-anna@...com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with
>>>>> specific dma memory pool
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 6:16 AM Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch creates a dedicated vdev subdevice for each vdev declared
>>>>>> in firmware resource table and associates carveout named
>> "vdev%dbuffer"
>>>>>> (with %d vdev index in resource table) if any as dma coherent memory
>>>>> pool.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then vdev subdevice is used as parent for virtio device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 35
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 1 +
>>>>>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 42
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 1 +
>>>>>> 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>>>>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>>>>>> index 4edc6f0..adcc66e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>>>>>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>>>>> #include <linux/idr.h>
>>>>>> #include <linux/elf.h>
>>>>>> #include <linux/crc32.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>>>>>> #include <linux/virtio_ids.h>
>>>>>> #include <linux/virtio_ring.h>
>>>>>> #include <asm/byteorder.h>
>>>>>> @@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ static void rproc_disable_iommu(struct rproc
>>>>> *rproc)
>>>>>> iommu_domain_free(domain);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -static phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr)
>>>>>> +phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> /*
>>>>>> * Return physical address according to virtual address location
>>>>>> @@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ static phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void
>>>>> *cpu_addr)
>>>>>> WARN_ON(!virt_addr_valid(cpu_addr));
>>>>>> return virt_to_phys(cpu_addr);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_va_to_pa);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /**
>>>>>> * rproc_da_to_va() - lookup the kernel virtual address for a
>> remoteproc
>>>>> address
>>>>>> @@ -423,6 +425,20 @@ static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct
>>>>> rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /**
>>>>>> + * rproc_rvdev_release() - release the existence of a rvdev
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * @dev: the subdevice's dev
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(dev, struct rproc_vdev,
>> dev);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + kfree(rvdev);
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>> * rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource
>>>>>> * @rproc: the remote processor
>>>>>> * @rsc: the vring resource descriptor
>>>>>> @@ -455,6 +471,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc
>> *rproc,
>>>>> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
>>>>>> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>>>>>> struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
>>>>>> int i, ret;
>>>>>> + char name[16];
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* make sure resource isn't truncated */
>>>>>> if (sizeof(*rsc) + rsc->num_of_vrings * sizeof(struct
>>>>> fw_rsc_vdev_vring)
>>>>>> @@ -488,6 +505,18 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc
>> *rproc,
>>>>> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
>>>>>> rvdev->rproc = rproc;
>>>>>> rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev++;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + /* Initialise vdev subdevice */
>>>>>> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index);
>>>>>> + rvdev->dev.parent = rproc->dev.parent;
>>>>>> + rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release;
>>>>>> + dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev-
>>>>>> dev.parent), name);
>>>>>> + dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev);
>>>>>> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&rvdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>>>>> I tried the latest kernel, this function will not set the DMA coherent mask
>> as
>>>>> dma_supported() of the &rvdev->dev will return false.
>>>>> As this is a device created at run time, should it be force to support
>> DMA?
>>>>> should it directly set the dma_coherent_mask?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for pointing me this issue. I tested on top of 4.18-rc1 few months
>> ago...
>>>> Could you please give me kernel version on which you are testing the
>> series?
>>>> Is you platform 32bit or 64bit ?
>>>> I'll rebase and check on my side.
>>>
>>> I am testing with 4.19-rc4 on aarch64 platform.
>>
>> Btw, I ran into this on my v7 platform as well (4.19-rc6). The
>> dma_set_coherent_mask fails with error EIO. I did get my allocations
>> through though.
>
> I don't have issue on v7 platform. Anyway I have now an Xilinx Ultra96 board running on my desk. It looks like vdev device doesn't have dma support, so not possible to set mask.
> Need to continue the investigations...
Strange how it is working for you, the dma support on vdev device should
be the same for all of us right - vdevs are created during runtime.
Think somehow, dma_supported() function is returning non-zero value for you.
regards
Suman
> Regards,
> Loic
>>
>> regards
>> Suman
>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Wendy
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Loic
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev);
>>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>>> + goto free_rvdev;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> /* parse the vrings */
>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) {
>>>>>> ret = rproc_parse_vring(rvdev, rsc, i);
>>>>>> @@ -518,7 +547,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc
>> *rproc,
>>>>> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
>>>>>> for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
>>>>>> rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]);
>>>>>> free_rvdev:
>>>>>> - kfree(rvdev);
>>>>>> + device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -536,7 +565,7 @@ void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
>>>>>> list_del(&rvdev->node);
>>>>>> - kfree(rvdev);
>>>>>> + device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /**
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>>>>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>>>>>> index f6cad24..bfeacfd 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>>>>>> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct dentry *rproc_create_trace_file(const char
>>>>> *name, struct rproc *rproc,
>>>>>> int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len);
>>>>>> +phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr);
>>>>>> int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware
>> *fw);
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>>>>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>>>>>> index de21f62..9ee63c0 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
>>>>>> @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
>>>>>> * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>>>>>> #include <linux/export.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>>>>>> #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>>>>>> #include <linux/virtio.h>
>>>>>> #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
>>>>>> @@ -315,10 +317,48 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct
>> device
>>>>> *dev)
>>>>>> int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc;
>>>>>> - struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>>>>>> + struct device *dev = &rvdev->dev;
>>>>>> struct virtio_device *vdev = &rvdev->vdev;
>>>>>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + /* Try to find dedicated vdev buffer carveout */
>>>>>> + mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdev%dbuffer",
>> rvdev-
>>>>>> index);
>>>>>> + if (mem) {
>>>>>> + phys_addr_t pa;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (mem->of_resm_idx != -1) {
>>>>>> + struct device_node *np = rproc->dev.parent->of_node;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Associate reserved memory to vdev device */
>>>>>> + ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np,
>>>>>> + mem->of_resm_idx);
>>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Can't associate reserved memory\n");
>>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>> + if (mem->va) {
>>>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "vdev %d buffer already mapped\n",
>>>>>> + rvdev->index);
>>>>>> + pa = rproc_va_to_pa(mem->va);
>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>> + /* Use dma address as carveout no memmapped yet
>> */
>>>>>> + pa = (phys_addr_t)mem->dma;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Associate vdev buffer memory pool to vdev subdev */
>>>>>> + ret = dmam_declare_coherent_memory(dev, pa,
>>>>>> + mem->da,
>>>>>> + mem->len,
>>>>>> + DMA_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE);
>>>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to associate buffer\n");
>>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> vdev->id.device = id,
>>>>>> vdev->config = &rproc_virtio_config_ops,
>>>>>> vdev->dev.parent = dev;
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>>>>> index 6b3a234..2921dd2 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>>>>> @@ -547,6 +547,7 @@ struct rproc_vdev {
>>>>>> struct kref refcount;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> struct rproc_subdev subdev;
>>>>>> + struct device dev;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> unsigned int id;
>>>>>> struct list_head node;
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 1.9.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
>> remoteproc"
>>>>> in
>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists