linux-kernel - Re: Regression: OOPs on boot due to "wlcore: Add support for optional wakeirq"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:31:55 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, Eyal Reizer <eyalr@...com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Regression: OOPs on boot due to "wlcore: Add support for
 optional wakeirq"

Hi,

* John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> [181025 17:15]:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:04 AM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
> > Should we check wakeirq before we set the second elements of res[]?
> 
> Here's my first swing at doing the above. It seems to work ok. Let me
> know if it looks reasonable and I'll submit it as a proper patch.
> 
> https://git.linaro.org/people/john.stultz/android-dev.git/commit/?h=dev/hikey-mainline-WIP&id=383fb6e3abb71b8a721f196120a2e3a9da3315ac

Yes thanks for fixing it, looks good to me:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>