[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+DvKQLpizz2LJppOts1fB6ujQNqj0fii8mo-UfosoYpQWRb5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:39:08 -0400
From: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, jroedel@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/pkeys: copy pkey state at fork()
I ended up working around this with a pthread_atfork handler disabling
my usage of the feature in the child process for the time being. I
don't have an easy way to detect if the bug is present within a
library so I'm going to need a kernel version check with a table of
kernel releases fixing the problem for each stable branch.
It would be helpful if there was a new cpuinfo flag to check if the
MPK state is preserved on fork in addition to the existing ospke flag.
The problem will fade away over time but in my experience there are a
lot of people using distributions with kernels not incorporating all
of the stable fixes. I expect other people will run into the problem
once hardware with MPK is more widely available and other people try
to use it for various things like moving GC or assorted security
features. Someone will end up running software adopting it on an older
kernel with the problem.
The clobbering issue I found with MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE isn't quite
as annoying because it was easy to make a runtime test usable in a library
to see if the feature works properly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists