linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c:ocores: do not handle IRQ if IF is not set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181029085259.GA4101@kunai>
Date:   Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:53:01 +0000
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
Cc:     Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...n.ch>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c:ocores: do not handle IRQ if IF is not set

On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 04:12:10PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:14 PM Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...n.ch> wrote:
> >
> > If the Interrupt Flag (IF) is not set, we should not handle the IRQ:
> > - the line can be shared with other devices
> > - it can be a spurious interrupt
> >
> > To avoid reading twice the status register, the ocores_process() function
> > expects it to be read by the caller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...n.ch>
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>

I assume this patch will be resent when the other patches get updated?
Or shall I pick this one independently of the others?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)