lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:53:01 +0000
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
Cc:     Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...n.ch>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c:ocores: do not handle IRQ if IF is not set

On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 04:12:10PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:14 PM Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...n.ch> wrote:
> >
> > If the Interrupt Flag (IF) is not set, we should not handle the IRQ:
> > - the line can be shared with other devices
> > - it can be a spurious interrupt
> >
> > To avoid reading twice the status register, the ocores_process() function
> > expects it to be read by the caller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...n.ch>
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>

I assume this patch will be resent when the other patches get updated?
Or shall I pick this one independently of the others?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists