[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+DvKQKUCVN5OUxShwxhXUnx5Qx0EUZSCeKOAUYR2CWW+NkO_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 04:55:07 -0400
From: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, jroedel@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/pkeys: copy pkey state at fork()
Yeah, a no-op pkey_alloc flag tied to this patch to provide a way to
detect if pkey state is preserved on fork, since kernels without the
patch would report EINVAL. Something like
PKEY_ASSERT_FORK_INHERIT_STATE would make sense. Otherwise, it's
going to be quite painful to adopt this in userspace software without kernel
version checks. Most software can't accept causing a crash / abort
after forking in environments not applying all the stable kernel
patches, or in fresh OS installs that aren't fully updated + rebooted yet.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists