lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLbWT62xHk1jVCeo8nrqCj9ECSqGpEFWKXP6qd5jxiRpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:14:14 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/pkeys: copy pkey state at fork()

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
> On 10/26/18 12:51 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> ...
>> The result is that, after a fork(), the child's pkey state ends up
>> looking like it does after an execve(), which is totally wrong.  pkeys
>> that are already allocated can be allocated again, for instance.
>
> One thing I omitted.  This was very nicely discovered and reported by
> danielmicay@...il.com.  Thanks, Daniel!

Thread ping. Is there a v2 of this, or can this go in as-is? Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ