[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1540837876.196084.75.camel@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:31:16 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] blk-mq: separate number of hardware queues from
nr_cpu_ids
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 10:37 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> With multiple maps, nr_cpu_ids is no longer the maximum number of
> hardware queues we support on a given devices. The initializer of
> the tag_set can have set ->nr_hw_queues larger than the available
> number of CPUs, since we can exceed that with multiple queue maps.
>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 0fab36372ace..60a951c4934c 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2663,6 +2663,19 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Maximum number of queues we support. For single sets, we'll never have
^
hardware?
> + * more than the CPUs (software queues). For multiple sets, the tag_set
> + * user may have set ->nr_hw_queues larger.
> + */
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists