lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMh=iJ-LE25ooVmoSVD7Rw9AzrJhXbP2X4+OeeUwmV5HnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 28 Oct 2018 22:25:41 -0700
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:     Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Devicetree updates for 4.20

Hi Rob,

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 9:07 AM Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Linus,
>
> Please pull DT updates for 4.20. A bit bigger than normal as I've been
> busy this cycle. There's a few things with dependencies and a few
> things subsystem maintainers didn't pick up, so I'm taking them thru
> my tree. The fixes from Johan didn't get into linux-next, but they've
> been waiting for some time now and they are what's left of what
> subsystem maintainers didn't pick up. There's no conflicts yet with
> your tree, but there are 2 conflicts I'm aware of. One is with the c6x
> tree and the other is in drivers/soc/qcom/apr.c. The correct
> resolutions are in linux-next.
>
[...]

>       scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version v1.4.7-14-gc86da84d30e4

This update made dtc spit out a large number of warnings on a regular
build, due to a new requirement that a SPI node is named "spi". Seems
like an arbitrary restriction, but either way can the warning please
be disabled by default until them cleaned up so we don't have a bunch
of noise in the logs?

An example ARM allmodconfig:
http://arm-soc.lixom.net/buildlogs/mainline/v4.19-9418-g9f51ae62c84a2/buildall.arm.allmodconfig.log.passed
(162 warnings).

Thanks,

-Olof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ