[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64ec3df3-27f8-4d75-5ec9-6427ffcf1244@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:40:54 +0800
From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] blk-mq: refactor the code of issue request
directly
Hi Ming
On 10/29/18 10:49 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 12:01:09AM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>> Merge blk_mq_try_issue_directly and __blk_mq_try_issue_directly
>> into one interface which is able to handle the return value from
>> .queue_rq callback. Due to we can only issue directly w/o io
>> scheduler, so remove the blk_mq_get_driver_tag.
>
> It isn't correct for dm-rq, see blk_insert_cloned_request().
>
Yes, got it.
when the original requests are issued to the underlying paths as cloned
requests, they should not pass through the io scheduler.
Thanks
Jianchao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists