lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5bff9c7-2c94-8988-cf76-318fa0808cf0@grimberg.me>
Date:   Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:49:02 -0700
From:   Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] blk-mq: allow software queue to map to multiple
 hardware queues



> @@ -2342,10 +2346,16 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
>   
>   		ctx = per_cpu_ptr(q->queue_ctx, i);
>   		hctx = blk_mq_map_queue_type(q, 0, i);
> -
> +		hctx->type = 0;
>   		cpumask_set_cpu(i, hctx->cpumask);
> -		ctx->index_hw = hctx->nr_ctx;
> +		ctx->index_hw[hctx->type] = hctx->nr_ctx;
>   		hctx->ctxs[hctx->nr_ctx++] = ctx;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If the nr_ctx type overflows, we have exceeded the
> +		 * amount of sw queues we can support.
> +		 */
> +		BUG_ON(!hctx->nr_ctx);

Was this added because nr_ctx became short? What was the motivation
for that? save space? structure alignment?

Perhaps this should be mentioned in the change log (as it contradicts
that no functional changes exist in this patch). Or, if this can happen
even when 32bit nr_ctx, it should be a separate small patch?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ