[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95e50d97-7cb3-7632-6e3f-b75ce32153ff@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 08:19:10 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] blk-mq: allow software queue to map to multiple
hardware queues
On 10/30/18 6:49 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>
>> @@ -2342,10 +2346,16 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
>>
>> ctx = per_cpu_ptr(q->queue_ctx, i);
>> hctx = blk_mq_map_queue_type(q, 0, i);
>> -
>> + hctx->type = 0;
>> cpumask_set_cpu(i, hctx->cpumask);
>> - ctx->index_hw = hctx->nr_ctx;
>> + ctx->index_hw[hctx->type] = hctx->nr_ctx;
>> hctx->ctxs[hctx->nr_ctx++] = ctx;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the nr_ctx type overflows, we have exceeded the
>> + * amount of sw queues we can support.
>> + */
>> + BUG_ON(!hctx->nr_ctx);
>
> Was this added because nr_ctx became short? What was the motivation
> for that? save space? structure alignment?
Right, I made it smaller to not take up more space after this change.
And since it is now smaller, adding a check for wrap seemed like
a good idea.
> Perhaps this should be mentioned in the change log (as it contradicts
> that no functional changes exist in this patch). Or, if this can happen
> even when 32bit nr_ctx, it should be a separate small patch?
Could happen for any type, but more likely now of course. I'll
mention this in the changelog.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists