linux-kernel - Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH] drm: Remove 80-column line in drm_mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKMK7uEuoNRT7g+iRVTmcjt6zS5dotATrFgV4QTLxs2Fg33OYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:24:45 +0100
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
To:     "Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Shayenne da Luz Moura <shayenneluzmoura@...il.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH] drm: Remove 80-column line in drm_mode_object.c

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:13 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Shayenne da Luz Moura <shayenneluzmoura@...il.com> wrote:
> > Add a new variable to make the drm_mode_object comparison before
> > idr_alloc and decrease line size.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shayenne da Luz Moura <shayenneluzmoura@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > index be8b754eaf60..4b9eafddb409 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > @@ -36,9 +36,10 @@ int __drm_mode_object_add(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_mode_object *obj,
> >                         void (*obj_free_cb)(struct kref *kref))
> >  {
> >       int ret;
> > +     struct drm_mode_object *obj_tmp = register_obj ? obj : NULL;
> >
> >       mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
> > -     ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, register_obj ? obj : NULL, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, obj_tmp, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Please don't send checkpatch "fixes" to adhere to the 80-column rule. Or
> at least use --max-line-length=100 or something to look for worse
> offenders than this.
>
> And if you insist, please just add a newline and proper indentation
> after "NULL," instead of adding a temporary variable.

Breaking the line after NULL, seems reasonable, I'd be happy to merge that.
-Daniel

>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> >       if (ret >= 0) {
> >               /*
> >                * Set up the object linking under the protection of the idr
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/87a7mudu8t.fsf%40intel.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch