[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181101113330.GB11109@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:33:30 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com>,
Przemyslaw Gaj <pgaj@...ence.com>,
Rafal Ciepiela <rafalc@...ence.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Addition of the I3C subsystem in 4.20 (5.0)?
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 06:35:23AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hello Greg, Linus,
>
> Greg, I didn't get your feedback on v10 of the i3c patchset [1] where I
> was asking if you'd agree to have this framework merged in 4.20 (I know
> you were busy with the 4.19 release and after that the Kernel Summit, so
> that's not a surprise), so I'm sending this PR. It's really not an attempt
> to bypass you, more like a ping that, if positively acknowledged, might
> lead to inclusion of the I3C framework in 4.20 (5.0?) :-).
>
> Please let me know if you're opposed to the idea.
>
> Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/26/552
The last set of patches was sent way too late for this -rc cycle so I
was going to review them again once 4.20-rc1 was out.
Also you do not have an ack from the DT maintainers yet, which would be
required as well, right?
So I don't think this can be merged just yet, sorry.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists