linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Addition of the I3C subsystem in 4.20 (5.0)?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181101132950.7b5f8ec3@bbrezillon>
Date:   Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:29:50 +0100
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com>,
        Przemyslaw Gaj <pgaj@...ence.com>,
        Rafal Ciepiela <rafalc@...ence.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Addition of the I3C subsystem in 4.20 (5.0)?

Hello Greg,

On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:33:30 +0100
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 06:35:23AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hello Greg, Linus,
> > 
> > Greg, I didn't get your feedback on v10 of the i3c patchset [1] where I
> > was asking if you'd agree to have this framework merged in 4.20 (I know
> > you were busy with the 4.19 release and after that the Kernel Summit, so
> > that's not a surprise), so I'm sending this PR. It's really not an attempt
> > to bypass you, more like a ping that, if positively acknowledged, might
> > lead to inclusion of the I3C framework in 4.20 (5.0?) :-).
> > 
> > Please let me know if you're opposed to the idea.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Boris
> > 
> > [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/26/552   
> 
> The last set of patches was sent way too late for this -rc cycle so I
> was going to review them again once 4.20-rc1 was out.
> 
> Also you do not have an ack from the DT maintainers yet, which would be
> required as well, right?

I had a R-b from Rob on Tuesday.

> 
> So I don't think this can be merged just yet, sorry.

Okay, then I'm waiting for your review.

Thanks,

Boris