[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38Fh99QmusGbEBi9TjUKQbQDX90pEaUC5Y=s-BL=RQ3o_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 12:01:18 -0700
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
To: jrdr.linux@...il.com
Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>, brajeswar.linux@...il.com,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sabyasachi.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/asm/cmpxchg.h: Remove duplicate header
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:55 AM Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com> wrote:
> We run the static analyser "make includecheck" which list out files where
> duplicate headers can be removed and based on that we thought to remove
> from this file. Didn't understood about the existence of second include ??
#define ____xchg(type, args...) __xchg ## type ## _local(args)
#define ____cmpxchg(type, args...) __cmpxchg ## type ## _local(args)
#include <asm/xchg.h>
[snip]
#undef ____xchg
#undef ____cmpxchg
#define ____xchg(type, args...) __xchg ##type(args)
#define ____cmpxchg(type, args...) __cmpxchg ##type(args)
#include <asm/xchg.h>
asm/xchg.h has a comment at the top that says
/*
* xchg/xchg_local and cmpxchg/cmpxchg_local share the same code
* except that local version do not have the expensive memory barrier.
* So this file is included twice from asm/cmpxchg.h.
*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists