[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181103160618.wioq7jbdh4z5yqdw@renatolg>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 13:06:19 -0300
From: Renato Lui Geh <renatogeh@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>,
"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
"knaack.h@....de" <knaack.h@....de>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
"renatogeh@...il.com" <renatogeh@...il.com>,
"giuliano.belinassi@....br" <giuliano.belinassi@....br>,
"pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"kernel-usp@...glegroups.com" <kernel-usp@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] staging: iio: ad7780: update voltage on read
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:20:55 +0000
"Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
>
> This looks wrong.
> I admit this was done in the same way in the probe function, but that looks
> a bit wrong as well.
>
> Typically, the return value of `regulator_get_voltage()` would get checked
> with:
>
> ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->reg);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> *val = ret / 1000;
>
> So, negative values are errors and zero & positive values are valid voltage
> values.
I see. So -EINVAL is only used when sent the wrong info type?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists