[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181103172125.40541052@archlinux>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 17:21:25 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Renato Lui Geh <renatogeh@...il.com>
Cc: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>,
"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
"knaack.h@....de" <knaack.h@....de>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
"giuliano.belinassi@....br" <giuliano.belinassi@....br>,
"pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"kernel-usp@...glegroups.com" <kernel-usp@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] staging: iio: ad7780: update voltage on read
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 13:06:19 -0300
Renato Lui Geh <renatogeh@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:20:55 +0000
> "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> >
> > This looks wrong.
> > I admit this was done in the same way in the probe function, but that looks
> > a bit wrong as well.
> >
> > Typically, the return value of `regulator_get_voltage()` would get checked
> > with:
> >
> > ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->reg);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> > *val = ret / 1000;
> >
> > So, negative values are errors and zero & positive values are valid voltage
> > values.
>
> I see. So -EINVAL is only used when sent the wrong info type?
yes. I actually misread what was there and thought we were just talking
about using a ret variable rather than returning the error via your
local variable.
Definitely want to pass on the error from regulator_get_voltage as
it may have more meaning than a simple -EINVAL.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists