[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181105091230.z2ooz7olbdpopxyd@viti.kaiser.cx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 10:12:30 +0100
From: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: i.MX25: add the clocks for the EPIT blocks
Hi,
Thus wrote Shawn Guo (shawnguo@...nel.org):
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 06:32:47PM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> > The i.MX25 contains two EPIT (Enhanced Periodic Interrupt Timer)
> > function blocks. Add their ipg and per clocks to the device tree.
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
> Are these EPIT devices actually used in upstream kernel, or just
> somewhere else?
Until I saw Vladimir's mail this morning, I wasn't aware of any mainline
driver that's using the EPIT devices. I found that the clocks are
missing when I tried to use EPIT with a company-internal driver that's
not suitable for mainline integration.
Still, I think that merging this patch does no harm. If the EPIT devices
are present in the DT, we should add all resources they're using.
Thanks & best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists