[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a97f3d77-d23b-b418-abce-2d93ed725bdb@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 06:53:16 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc: Linux Block Layer Mailinglist <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs
On 11/5/18 2:23 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static inline bool biovec_phys_mergeable(struct request_queue *q,
> static inline bool __bvec_gap_to_prev(struct request_queue *q,
> struct bio_vec *bprv, unsigned int offset)
> {
> - return offset ||
> + return (offset & queue_virt_boundary(q)) ||
> ((bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len) & queue_virt_boundary(q));
> }
How about changing that expression into the following to make it easier
for the compiler to optimize this code?
(offset | (bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len)) & queue_virt_boundary(q)
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists