[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d0812681-4a8f-8cc4-24ce-d02002ee34d2@deltatee.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 13:01:31 -0700
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/10] Makefile: Prepare for using macros for inline
asm
On 2018-11-06 12:18 p.m., Nadav Amit wrote:
> Err.. I don’t have a dist-cc environment. I wonder whether something like
> that would do the trick:
I tested it to be sure -- but, no, this does not have any affect on
distcc. Distcc usually does pre-processing locally and then sends the
single output of cpp to a remote for compilation and assembly. It
doesn't expect there to be additional assembly files tacked on the
command line and isn't going to handle that case correctly. Thus,
changing the path of the file won't fix anything.
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists