linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 02/10] Makefile: Prepare for using macros for inline asm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:01:23 +0000
From:   Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/10] Makefile: Prepare for using macros for inline
 asm

From: Logan Gunthorpe
Sent: November 6, 2018 at 8:01:31 PM GMT
> To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/10] Makefile: Prepare for using macros for inline asm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2018-11-06 12:18 p.m., Nadav Amit wrote:
>> Err.. I don’t have a dist-cc environment. I wonder whether something like
>> that would do the trick:
> 
> I tested it to be sure -- but, no, this does not have any affect on
> distcc. Distcc usually does pre-processing locally and then sends the
> single output of cpp to a remote for compilation and assembly. It
> doesn't expect there to be additional assembly files tacked on the
> command line and isn't going to handle that case correctly. Thus,
> changing the path of the file won't fix anything.

Thanks for the explanation.

I played with dist-cc and gave it some thought, but I do not have a
solution. I thought that perhaps some hack is possible by using the same
preprocessed file can be used as both the source file and the assembly file,
but that’s as far as I managed to get.

Ideas? Do people care about it?