[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc0d606c-c2e7-c23d-e1a5-cb9e0a30a937@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:01:08 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: rafaelgoncalves@...eup.net, mchehab@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkcamp@...ts.libreplanetbr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: staging: tegra-vde: Change from __attribute to
__packed.
On 07.11.2018 5:23, rafaelgoncalves@...eup.net wrote:
> From: Rafael Goncalves <rafaelgoncalves@...eup.net>
>
> Correct the following warnings from checkpatch.pl:
>
> WARNING: __packed is preferred over __attribute__((packed))
> +} __attribute__((packed));
>
> WARNING: __packed is preferred over __attribute__((packed))
> +} __attribute__((packed));
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael Goncalves <rafaelgoncalves@...eup.net>
>
> ---
>
> Hi.
> It's my first patch submission, please let me know if there is something
> that I can improve.
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/tegra-vde/uapi.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/tegra-vde/uapi.h b/drivers/staging/media/tegra-vde/uapi.h
> index a50c7bcae057..5ffa4afa4047 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/tegra-vde/uapi.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/tegra-vde/uapi.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct tegra_vde_h264_frame {
> __u32 flags;
>
> __u32 reserved;
> -} __attribute__((packed));
> +} __packed;
>
> struct tegra_vde_h264_decoder_ctx {
> __s32 bitstream_data_fd;
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct tegra_vde_h264_decoder_ctx {
> __u8 num_ref_idx_l1_active_minus1;
>
> __u32 reserved;
> -} __attribute__((packed));
> +} __packed;
>
> #define VDE_IOCTL_BASE ('v' + 0x20)
>
>
Hello Rafael,
Thank you very much for the patch, but looks like it is not correct. The Userspace API header is supposed to be used by kernel and userspace, the __packed macro is available in kernel only.
Interestingly there few places in include/uapi/ that use __packed macro, I'm wondering if they are correct. Note that GCC just won't complain about undefined qualifier, at least by default.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists