[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sh0dqec5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 23:09:14 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com> writes:
> Hi Michael, Ben, Paul,
>
> Do you know if anyone has tried this series on PowerPC?
I have. No obvious breakage.
My test does a loop of adding and removing multiple CPUs multiple times,
and in the past that has uncovered refcounting bugs. So I don't think
we're leaking any with this series applied.
I used the tracepoint patch to keep an eye on the refcounts :)
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/751602/
I'm happy for this series to go into linux-next where it should get some
more testing.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists