[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181107165200.oaou6cx2lmjzmjyl@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 16:52:00 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@....com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@....com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@....com>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Mark Brand <markbrand@...gle.com>,
Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>,
Vishwath Mohan <vishwath@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 08/22] kasan, arm64: untag address in __kimg_to_phys
and _virt_addr_is_linear
Hi Andrey,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 06:30:23PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> __kimg_to_phys (which is used by virt_to_phys) and _virt_addr_is_linear
> (which is used by virt_addr_valid) assume that the top byte of the address
> is 0xff, which isn't always the case with tag-based KASAN.
I'm confused by this. Why/when do kimg address have a non-default tag?
Any kimg address is part of the static kernel image, so it's not obvious
to me how a kimg address would gain a tag. Could you please explain how
this happens in the commit message?
> This patch resets the tag in those macros.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index 0f1e024a951f..3226a0218b0b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,15 @@
> #define KASAN_THREAD_SHIFT 0
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS
> +#define KASAN_TAG_SHIFTED(tag) ((unsigned long)(tag) << 56)
> +#define KASAN_SET_TAG(addr, tag) (((addr) & ~KASAN_TAG_SHIFTED(0xff)) | \
> + KASAN_TAG_SHIFTED(tag))
> +#define KASAN_RESET_TAG(addr) KASAN_SET_TAG(addr, 0xff)
> +#else
> +#define KASAN_RESET_TAG(addr) addr
> +#endif
Nit: the rest of the helper macros in this file are lower-case, with
specialised helpers prefixed with several underscores. Could we please
stick with that convention?
e.g. have __tag_set() and __tag_reset() helpers.
> +
> #define MIN_THREAD_SHIFT (14 + KASAN_THREAD_SHIFT)
>
> /*
> @@ -232,7 +241,7 @@ static inline unsigned long kaslr_offset(void)
> #define __is_lm_address(addr) (!!((addr) & BIT(VA_BITS - 1)))
>
> #define __lm_to_phys(addr) (((addr) & ~PAGE_OFFSET) + PHYS_OFFSET)
> -#define __kimg_to_phys(addr) ((addr) - kimage_voffset)
> +#define __kimg_to_phys(addr) (KASAN_RESET_TAG(addr) - kimage_voffset)
IIUC You need to adjust __lm_to_phys() too, since that could be passed
an address from SLAB.
Maybe that's done in a later patch, but if so it's confusing to split it
out that way. It would be nicer to fix all the *_to_*() helpers in one
go.
>
> #define __virt_to_phys_nodebug(x) ({ \
> phys_addr_t __x = (phys_addr_t)(x); \
> @@ -308,7 +317,8 @@ static inline void *phys_to_virt(phys_addr_t x)
> #endif
> #endif
>
> -#define _virt_addr_is_linear(kaddr) (((u64)(kaddr)) >= PAGE_OFFSET)
> +#define _virt_addr_is_linear(kaddr) (KASAN_RESET_TAG((u64)(kaddr)) >= \
> + PAGE_OFFSET)
This is painful to read. Could you please split this like:
#define _virt_addr_is_linear(kaddr) \
(__tag_reset((u64)(kaddr)) >= PAGE_OFFSET)
... and we could reformat virt_addr_valid() in the same way while we're
at it.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists