[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04f677b1-bc44-f004-cf2a-51b47baf0965@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:46:41 -0800
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>, mcgrof@...nel.org,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
joe@...ches.com, brakmo@...com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Tim.Bird@...y.com, khilman@...libre.com,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jdike@...toit.com, richard@....at, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/14] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit
testing framework
On 11/6/18 5:17 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:23 AM Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Brendan,
> <snip>
>> Framework looks good. I think it would be helpful to include a real test
>
> Great to hear!
>
>> in the patch series to get a feel for how effective it is.
>
> Alright, will do. Rob suggested converting
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.19/source/drivers/of/unittest.c to
> KUnit, so that might offer a good comparison.
drivers/of/unittest.c might be a bit bigger and more complex test than
you want to start with.
-Frank
< snip >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists