linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 00/14] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:46:41 -0800
From:   Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, shuah@...nel.org
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        joe@...ches.com, brakmo@...com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        Tim.Bird@...y.com, khilman@...libre.com,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        jdike@...toit.com, richard@....at, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
        kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/14] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit
 testing framework

On 11/6/18 5:17 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:23 AM Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Brendan,
> <snip>
>> Framework looks good. I think it would be helpful to include a real test
> 
> Great to hear!
> 
>> in the patch series to get a feel for how effective it is.
> 
> Alright, will do. Rob suggested converting
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.19/source/drivers/of/unittest.c to
> KUnit, so that might offer a good comparison.

drivers/of/unittest.c might be a bit bigger and more complex test than
you want to start with.

-Frank

< snip >