lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 8 Nov 2018 08:09:57 +0000
From:   chouryzhou(周威) <chouryzhou@...cent.com>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
CC:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "arve@...roid.com" <arve@...roid.com>,
        "tkjos@...roid.com" <tkjos@...roid.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        chouryzhou(周威) <chouryzhou@...cent.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2] binder: ipc namespace support for android binder

> From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 3:00 PM
> 
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, chouryzhou(??????) wrote:
> >@@ -63,6 +63,12 @@ struct ipc_namespace {
> >        unsigned int    mq_msg_default;
> >        unsigned int    mq_msgsize_default;
> >
> >+       /* next fields are for binder */
> >+       struct mutex      binder_procs_lock;
> >+       struct hlist_head binder_procs;
> >+       struct mutex      binder_contexts_lock;
> >+       struct hlist_head binder_contexts;
> 
> I don't think you want a mutex here protecting the binder_contexts list.
> Afaict there is no concurrency going on: you only modify it in when doing
> namespace init and exit (for which you have no serialization); do you even
> need a lock here? Or at least I would think a more lightweight alternative
> (rcu/spinlock/rwlock) would suffice.

Yes, you're right, the binder_contexts is just modified when initing and exiting
namespace, we don't need this lock.
I will update the code you mentioned above.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ