[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181108110532.GA30851@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 03:05:32 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Documentation/process: Add tip tree handbook
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:12:51AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 08:40:12AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > + - Cc: ``cc-ed-person <person@...l>``
> > > +
> > > + If the patch should be backported to stable, then please add a '``Cc:
> > > + stable@...r.kernel.org``' tag, but do not Cc stable when sending your
> > > + mail.
> >
> > Can I suggest a more canonical form:
> >
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.18 and later kernels
> >
> > It would be nice if people adding Cc: stable lines would actually try to
> > figure out which exact kernel versions are affected.
>
> I think Greg actually prefers we use stable@...nel.org, which is a
> /dev/null target. His bot will then pick up on the tag once it hits
> Linus' tree.
I really do not care either way what address is used. Both work fine.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists