linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] x86/jump_label: Use text_poke_early() during early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:41:41 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] x86/jump_label: Use text_poke_early() during
 early_init

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 07:13:03PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c b/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
> > index aac0c1f7e354..ed5fe274a7d8 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
> > @@ -52,7 +52,12 @@ static void __ref __jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
> > 	jmp.offset = jump_entry_target(entry) -
> > 		     (jump_entry_code(entry) + JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE);
> > 
> > -	if (early_boot_irqs_disabled)
> > +	/*
> > +	 * As long as we're UP and not yet marked RO, we can use
> > +	 * text_poke_early; SYSTEM_BOOTING guarantees both, as we switch to
> > +	 * SYSTEM_SCHEDULING before going either.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING)
> > 		poker = text_poke_early;
> > 
> > 	if (type == JUMP_LABEL_JMP) {
> 
> Thanks for this change, I will incorporate it.
> 
> I wanted to point a small difference from my version. Although this version
> ensures we are UP and the kernel is still RW, preemption is possible with
> this version. I presume that it should not affect jump-labels, since it
> switches between JMP and multi-byte NOPs.

Right, we're never running the code we're going to change on UP.