linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] z3fold: fix wrong handling of headless pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMJBoFP3C5NffHf2bPaY-W2qXPLs6z+Ker+Z+Sq_3MHV5xekHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:57:17 +0100
From:   Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
To:     김종석 <ks77sj@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] z3fold: fix wrong handling of headless pages

Den tors 8 nov. 2018 kl 13:34 skrev 김종석 <ks77sj@...il.com>:
>
> Hi Vitaly,
> thank you for the reply.
>
> I agree your a new solution is more comprehensive and drop my patch is simple way.
> But, I think it's not fair.
> If my previous patch was not wrong, is (my patch -> your patch) the right way?

I could apply the new patch on top of yours but that would effectively
revert most of your changes.
Would it be ok for you if I add you to Signed-off-by for the new patch instead?

~Vitaly

> I'm sorry I sent reply twice.
>
> Best regards,
> Jongseok
>
>
> > On 6/11/2018 4:48 PM, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> > Hi Jongseok,
>
> > thank you for your work, we've now got a more comprehensive solution:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/5/726
>
> > Would you please confirm that it works for you? Also, would you be
> >okay with dropping your patch in favor of the new one?
>
> > ~Vitaly