linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] z3fold: fix wrong handling of headless pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181108134540.12756-1-ks77sj@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu,  8 Nov 2018 22:45:40 +0900
From:   Jongseok Kim <ks77sj@...il.com>
To:     Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jongseok Kim <ks77sj@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] z3fold: fix wrong handling of headless pages

Yes, you are right.
I think that's the best way to deal it.
Thank you.

Best regards,
Jongseok

> Den tors 8 nov. 2018 kl 13:34 skrev 김종석 <ks77sj@...il.com>:
> >
> > Hi Vitaly,
> > thank you for the reply.
> >
> > I agree your a new solution is more comprehensive and drop my patch is simple way.
> > But, I think it's not fair.
> > If my previous patch was not wrong, is (my patch -> your patch) the right way?

> I could apply the new patch on top of yours but that would effectively
> revert most of your changes.
> Would it be ok for you if I add you to Signed-off-by for the new patch instead?

> ~Vitaly


> > I'm sorry I sent reply twice.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jongseok
> >
> >
> > > On 6/11/2018 4:48 PM, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> > > Hi Jongseok,
> >
> > > thank you for your work, we've now got a more comprehensive solution:
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/5/726
> >
> > > Would you please confirm that it works for you? Also, would you be
> > >okay with dropping your patch in favor of the new one?
> >
> > > ~Vitaly