[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181108150445.GA31100@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 07:04:45 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Linux Block Layer Mailinglist <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 08:10:19AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > I personally not a huge fan of decoding complicated expressions. But if
> > others are fine with it then I am too...
>
> What I proposed is not a new pattern. It is a pattern that is already used
> elsewhere in the Linux kernel. A few examples:
>
> >From dmabounce.c:
>
> /* Figure out if we need to bounce from the DMA mask. */
> if ((dma_addr | (dma_addr + size - 1)) & ~mask)
> return 1;
>
> >From dma-direct.h:
>
> if ((addr | (addr + size - 1)) & ~mask)
> return 0;
Time for a well documented helper :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists